HLT540 week 3 Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 1 Analysis Assignment
Follow Below Link to
Download File
https://homeworklance.com/downloads/hlt540-week-3-coyne-messina-articles-part-1-analysis-assignment/
Email us for original
and Plagiarism Free Work At ( info.homeworklance@gmail.com ) or order us at (https://homeworklance.com/custom-order/ )
Details:
1) In a paper
(1,000-1,250 words), compare and contrast the major elements of the reports by
Coyne et al. and Messina et al., listed in the Module 2 Readings.
2) Complete the “Coyne
and Messina Articles Analysis.” Study the information in the right-side column
related to the Coyne, et al. study, which identifies the required elements as
found in the reading. Complete the information for the Messina et al. article
by identifying the required elements from the article.
3) Prepare this
assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment
uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the
assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for
successful completion of the assignment.
Coyne and Messina
Articles Analysis
As an example
guideline, review the study components in the left-side column of the table
below. Read the study by Messina et al., and build the data in the right-side
column with the key components in that study.
|
Research Question:
|
Coyne:Do
size and ownership type make a difference in the efficiency and cost results
of hospitals in Washington state? (Highlight p.164, second column, starting
15 lines from bottom to seven lines from bottom.)Messina:
|
|
How did the research question emerge from
the review of literature in the article?
|
Coyne:Built
on an earlier study by Coyne on performance differences between
multi-facility systems and independent hospitals using two cost measures.
Cited studies that used a range of variables to measure differences in
hospital performance, and noted that prior findings have been inconclusive in
regard to hospital size, although economies of scale were found.Messina:
|
|
Independent VariablesType:
|
Coyne:Hospital
size and hospital ownership structure.Categorical
Messina:
|
|
Dependent VariablesType:
|
Coyne:Efficiency
measures – continuous variables.Cost measures – continuous variables.
Messina:
|
|
Design Elements1. Quantitative vs.
Qualitative
2. Sample Size
3. Method of sample selection
4. Experimental vs. control group?
5. Reliable and valid data instruments?
|
Coyne:Quantitative
96
Picked all hospitals in state, except
investor owned hospitals.
No
Used data that are commonly used to measure
hospital efficiency and performance with high degrees of accuracy (reliable),
and data that are historically used and make sense to other hospital users
(valid).
Messina:
|
|
Describe analysis.What statistics were used?
|
Coyne:Two-way
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)Messina:
|
|
Did the researchers’ conclusions make sense,
did they answer the research question, and did they appear to flow from the
review of the literature?Did they explore control of extraneous variables?
|
Coyne:They
concluded that size and ownership type make a difference in reported levels
of efficiency. Not for profits seem to achieve higher performance levels, and
medium and large not for profits operate more efficiently than industry
average. The same results were found for cost levels, in that size and
ownership type do make a difference, with medium sized hospitals reporting
lower costs than large or small hospitals.Yes, when they called for national
studies that controlled for case mix, scope of services, and payer mix, all
of which could have affected the results in this study in an unmeasured way.
Messina:
|
Comments
Post a Comment